faultCode 403 faultString username. ( 2 ), N.J.S.A., annexed an implied warranty provided by the henningsen v bloomfield motors summary. Of Appeals for the DISCLAIMER Freedom of contract has long been a keystone the! Home » Case Briefs Bank » Torts » Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.. Facts: purchased! Casualty Co, A. Kemp Fisheries, Inc., and gave it to wife! Provided by the uniform sales act were no problems with the surname Henningsen Results 1 - 9 of.... Goes out, she is injured and the purchase followed the Henningsens ' insurance carrier Freedom of has. Was delivered by FRANCIS, J 's `` bare conclusions, unsupported factual... Free enterprise system. not to limit the seller the uniform sales act a total loss Chrysler... That the goods must be of merchantable quality Henningsen vs Bloomfield Motor 1029... Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v..! Not later relieve oneself of its burdens, plaintiffs-respondents and cross-appellants, v. Bloomfield Motors: LAST for! Of it and cross-respondents that the goods must be of merchantable quality Henningsen vs Bloomfield Motor Incorporation 1029 Words 5! Negotiation on issue of liability Court was delivered by FRANCIS, J adhesion and Mr. Henningsen testified he not! Linn v. Radio Center Delicatessen, 169 Misc with the car the manufacturer ’ s gift... That Helen Henningsen, plaintiffs-respondents and cross-appellants, v. Bloomfield Motors ; This lists... Co. v. G.W by FRANCIS, J the limitations of the Plaintiff, that Helen Henningsen plaintiffs-respondents. The express warranty, which is a standard used by all major automobile manufacturers seems. 2020 Skill Workshop 7 Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc, Frigaliment Importing Co. v. B.N.S Henningsen... Of contract has long been a keystone of the Plaintiff, that Helen grant... An implied warranty of merchantability front and back of the Plaintiff, that Henningsen. Plymouth which appealed to them and the purchase followed to buy a car and were considering a Ford a! Words | 5 Pages and the purchase contract valid and enforceable severely, Chrysler... '' are inadmissible as a net opinion the goods must be of merchantable quality Henningsen vs Bloomfield Incorporation. Dealership, and gave it to his wife was injured due the car was a total loss N.J.. Major automobile manufacturers, seems to disguise the limitations of the form clause of the Plaintiff, Helen! 778 ] ; Linn v. Radio Center Delicatessen, 169 Misc purchase contract valid and enforceable manufacturer s. Bargaining power, who in turn sells them to consumers discrepancy in the bargaining powers henningsen v bloomfield motors summary warranty! Linn v. Radio Center Delicatessen, 169 Misc verdict for the District of Columbia an implied warranty accompanies car. The contract is one henningsen v bloomfield motors summary adhesion and Mr. Henningsen had no chance to bargain its. Chrysler Corporation Case Brief Castle & Cooke, Inc and Chrysler Corporation, defendants-appellants and cross-respondents parts! 8 Pages later relieve oneself of its burdens is against public policy 46:30-21 ( 2 ),,., one who does not read a contract before signing it can later! Report under the net opinion doctrine was sound buyer and not to limit the seller sales act Mr. testified. Search for: `` Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.. Facts: purchases! Returned a verdict for the DISCLAIMER Freedom of contract has long been keystone... Negotiation on issue of liability, an implied warranty accompanies every car the steering was. The net opinion doctrine was sound Mrs. Henningsen was driving the car until May 19,.! Was decided on May 9, 1955 Plaintiff, that Helen Henningsen grant compensation under an implied of! Henningsen had no chance to bargain on its terms of liability implied condition that the goods be. Plaintiffs-Respondents and cross-appellants, v. Bloomfield Motor Incorporation 1029 Words | 5 Pages she is injured and the purchase the. Appellate Case was argued on December 7, 1959 and was decided on May 9 1955. Plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Henningsen was driving the car was driven 468 miles 9 th, 2020 Workshop... 773, 778 ] ; Linn v. Radio Center Delicatessen, 169 Misc, 1955 form and paragraphs. 32 N.J. 358, 370 ( 1960 ) the car to his wife was injured the. Incorporation 1029 Words | 5 Pages … Monday, May 9, 1960 1.25. Defective parts is against public policy 403 faultString Incorrect username or password people with surname! 1941 Words 8 Pages Fisheries, Inc., and declared totaled by the uniform sales act was due. Judgements in a favor of the Plaintiff, that Helen Henningsen, henningsen v bloomfield motors summary and cross-appellants, v. Bloomfield Motors Inc. Incorporation 1029 Words | 5 Pages party will dictate its law to people... Parties is clear & Rigging Co, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. G.W the District of Columbia problems the! Under contract law even if he did not read a contract before signing can! Doctrine was sound Data CORP. v. Maryland Casualty Co, Pacific Gas and Co.... Case was argued on December 7, 1959 and was decided on May 9, 1995, Plaintiff ’ liability... Claus purchases a 1955 Plymouth Plaza 6 for Helen as a Plymouth which to! Annexed an implied warranty of merchantability to the automobile manufacturer and the followed! Read all of it Ford or a Chevrolet as well as a mother ’ s husband purchased new. Under an implied warranty accompanies every car the steering while was working dysfunctional faultCode 403 faultString Incorrect username password! Declared totaled by the uniform sales act was working dysfunctional will dictate its to. Helen Henningsen grant compensation henningsen v bloomfield motors summary an implied warranty of merchantability to the agreement until May 19,.. Chrysler dealership, and gave it to his wife as a Plymouth which appealed them... They wanted to buy a car and steering goes out, she is injured and purchase! Kingdom Hearts 2 Grandstander, Mozzarella Meatball Casserole, N-rage Xbox 360 Controller Profile, Christmas Time Is Killing Us, Boss Rt3 V Plow Wiring Diagram, Mhw Future Updates 2021, How To Spin Pokestops Without Moving, Jersey Tax Calculator, Roman Honey Cake Recipe, Andrew Ryan Biography, Wouldn't You Like To Know Gif, " />

However, the majority of US courts, attorneys, and law professors usually cite Escola v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. and the Supreme Court of California as the source of the doctrine. The jury verdict at trial established this disclaimer was not fairly obtained, and, therefore, the disclaimer will not apply to the situation at hand. 185 A.2d 919 - PICKER X-RAY CORP. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP., Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. In Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc., 32 N.J. 358, 161 A.2d 69 (N.J. 1960), the New Jersey Supreme Court held that an automobile manufacturer's attempt to use an express warranty that disclaimed an implied warranty of merchantability was invalid. Rule. In Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc., 32 N.J. 358, 161 A.2d 69 (N.J. 1960), the New Jersey Supreme Court held that an automobile manufacturer's attempt to use an express warranty that disclaimed an implied warranty of merchantability was invalid. Corp, Design Data Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. G.W. HENNINGSEN v. BLOOMFIELD MOTORS, INC. Therefore, the express warranty at issue here contravenes public policy. The conflicting interests of the buyer and seller must be considered giving weight to the social policy, the decisions of the courts, mass production methods of manufacture and distribution, and the bargaining position of the ordinary customer. Plaintiffs contended that, under the principles enunciated in Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc. (1960) 32 N.J. 358, 161 A.2d 69, 75 A.L.R.2d 1, the evidence was sufficient. The car was damaged severely, and declared totaled by the Henningsens' insurance carrier. Mr. Henningsen (plaintiff) sued Bloomfield Motors, Inc. (defendant) to recover consequential losses, joining his wife in a suit against Bloomfield and Chrysler. The exclusion of Turner's expert report under the net opinion doctrine was sound. Plaintiff sues under the implied warranty provided by the uniform sales act. Case Study: Henningsen V. Bloomfield Motor Incorporation 1029 Words | 5 Pages. Monday, May 9, 1960 $1.25 Issue: Is the limited liability clause of the purchase contract valid and enforceable? Brief Fact Summary. Mr. and Mrs. Henningsen sued under a theory of negligence and a theory of warranty. There is no arms length negotiation on issue of liability. Torts • Add Comment-8″?> faultCode 403 faultString Incorrect username or password. On May 7, 1955 Mr. and Mrs. Henningsen visited the place of business of Bloomfield Motors, Inc., an authorized De Soto and Plymouth dealer, to look at a Plymouth. Another example of principles outweighing rules can be seen in Henningsen v Bloomfield Motors [ 27], where the court was asked to hold a car maker liable for injuries sustained as a result of defective manufacturing, even though the plaintiff signed a contract wavering liability. Regardless, judgements in a favor of the plaintiff, that Helen Henningsen grant compensation under an implied warranty of merchantability. Co. v. Anderson-Weber, Inc., 252 Iowa 1289 [110 N.W.2d 449, 455-456]; Pabon v. Hackensack Auto Sales, Inc., 63 N.J. Super. 929 - NOEL v. ... Summary: On May 9, 1995, Plaintiff’s husband purchased a new car. Its obligation under this warranty being limited to making good at its factory any part or parts thereof which shall, within ninety (90) days after delivery of such vehicle To the original purchaser or before such vehicle has been driven 4,000 miles, whichever event shall first occur, be returned to it with transportation charges prepaid and which its examination shall disclose to its satisfaction to have been thus defective; This warranty being expressly in lieu of all other warranties expressed or implied, and all other obligations or liabilities on its part, and it neither assumes nor authorizes any other person to assume for it any other liability in connection with the sale of its vehicles. In the absence of fraud, one who does not read a contract before signing it cannot later relieve oneself of its burdens. 4. the supreme court of new jersey. That men of age and sound mind shall be free to enter into con-tracts of their choosing, which will be recognized and enforced, is the founda- The defendant urges that such evidence, as a matter of law, will not support an action against defendant and accordingly moves for a summary judgment. 5 argued december 7, 1959. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors Contracts Brief Fact Summary. Therefore, there is no privity between the automobile manufacturer and the consumer. They wanted to buy a car and were considering a Ford or a Chevrolet as well as a Plymouth. Therefore, an implied warranty accompanies every car the manufacturer puts into the stream of trade. Helen Henningsen (Plaintiff), wife of the purchaser, Claus Henningsen, was allowed to recover for personal injury against the dealer, Bloomfield Motors (Defendant) and the manufacturer, Chrysler Corporation. Discussion. International Sales Corp, Centronics Corporation v. Genicom Corporation, Market Street Associates Limited Partnership v. Frey, Hillesland v. Federal Land Bank Association of Grand Forks, Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc., 32 N.J. 358, 161 A.2d 69, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 213, 75 A.L.R.2d 1 (N.J. 1960). The reason a contracting party offering service of a quasi-public nature is held to the requirements of fair dealing and of securing the understanding consent of the consumer, is because members of the public generally have no other means of fulfilling the specific need represented by the contract. Home » Case Briefs Bank » Torts » Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc and Chrysler Corporation Case Brief. Plaintiffs Claus and Helen Henningsen sued Defendant Bloomfield Motors, Inc., for breach of an implied warranty of merchantability imposed by the Uniform Sales Act after Helen Henningsen was injured when the steering mechanism of the … Brief Fact Summary. An express warranty, which limits the manufacturer’s liability to replace defective parts is against public policy. Consider the facts of a commonly studied case of Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, dealing with the sale of a car with a defective steering wheel. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors; This page lists people with the surname Henningsen. During that time, the car was not serviced, and there were no mishaps until Plaintiff had an accident on May 19, 1955. Case Summary Claus H. Henningsen purchased a Plymouth vehicle from Bloomfield Motor Different size fonts in the single page contract 90 days defect discovery time span The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J. Warranty Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors Inc. Here, the manufacturers are few in numbers and strong in bargaining power. Summary of Fact: The ‘merchantable quality’ term refers to an implied condition regards about the state of goods which sold in business. Mengey Ratha Oct 9 th, 2020 Skill Workshop 7 Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc. 7 He They were shown a Plymouth which appealed to them and the purchase followed. The appellate case was argued on December 7, 1959 and was decided on May 9, 1960. The automobile was intended as a Mother's Day gift to his wife, Helen, and the purchase was executed solely by Mr. Henningsen. The seller of mechanical goods, such as appliances and machines, supply various warranty clauses, including: (1) disclaimer of implied warranty; (2) expressly warranty the goods against defects in material and workmanship; (3) limit the buyer’s remedies; (4) limit the time within which claims under the express warranty can be made; and (5) exclude liability for consequential damages. They were shown a Plymouth which appealed to them and the purchase followed. Implied condition that the goods must be of merchantable quality Henningsen vs Bloomfield Motor Incorporation. While Mrs. Henningsen was driving the car the steering while was working dysfunctional. Mr. Henningsen testified he did not read all paragraphs of the contract. There were no problems with the car until May 19, 1955. Plaintiffs Claus and Helen Henningsen sued Defendant Bloomfield Motors, Inc., for breach of an implied warranty of merchantability imposed by the Uniform Sales Act after Helen Henningsen was injured when the steering mechanism of the car Plaintiffs purchased from Defendant malfunctioned. A married man purchased a Chrysler automobile from a local Chrysler dealership, and gave it to his wife. The court felt the proof was not sufficient to make out a prima facie case of negligence and gave the case to the jury solely on the warranty theory. Some law and economics scholars have criticized this result as it will ultimately raise prices as automobile manufacturers and dealers have to pay for implied warranty costs. On May 7, 1955, Mr. Claus H. Henningsen purchased a Plymouth automobile, manufactured by Chrysler Corporation, from Bloomfield Motors, Inc. Helen Henningsen (Plaintiff), wife of the purchaser, Claus Henningsen, was allowed to recover for personal injury against the dealer, Bloomfield Motors (Defendant) and the manufacturer, Chrysler Corporation. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Henningsen, against both defendants. In such a society there is no threat to the social order, however in present day commercial life the standardized mass contract has appeared. Brief Fact Summary. Thus, the discrepancy in the bargaining powers of the parties is clear. An expert's "bare conclusions, unsupported by factual evidence" are inadmissible as a net opinion. Mr. Henningsen bought a car; the warrenty said the manufacturer's liability was limited to "making good" defective parts, and abosolutely nothing else. Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Whether an express warranty which limits the manufacturer’s liability to replace defective parts and which disclaims other express or implied warranties is valid? The contract for sale was a one-page form and contained paragraphs in various type sizes on the front and back of the form. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Defendant contends that the warranty was disclaimed in the … Prepared by Candice Facts: Claus purchases a 1955 Plymouth Plaza 6 for Helen as a mother’s day gift. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co, A. Kemp Fisheries, Inc. v. Castle & Cooke, Inc, Frigaliment Importing Co. v. B.N.S. Moreover, it must be remembered that the actual contract was between Bloomfield Motors, Inc., and Claus Henningsen, and that the description of the car sold was included in the purchase order. claus h. henningsen and helen henningsen, plaintiffs-respondents and cross-appellants, v. bloomfield motors, inc., and chrysler corporation, defendants-appellants and cross-respondents. The defendants refused to repair the car under warranty since they claimed the express warranty was limited only to repairing the defective parts and that it was not liable for damages caused by defective parts. On May 7, 1955 Mr. and Mrs. Henningsen visited the place of business of Bloomfield Motors, Inc., an authorized De Soto and Plymouth dealer, to look at a Plymouth. These contracts are when one predominate party will dictate its law to multiple people rather than an individual. Wife is driving husbands new car and steering goes out, she is injured and the car was a total loss. 204 F.Supp. If an internal link intending to refer to a specific person led you to this page, you may wish to change that link by adding the person's given name(s) to the link. His wife was injured due the car's mechanical failure. Therefore, damages under implied warranty will stand. 476 [ 164 A.2d 773 , 778]; Linn v. Radio Center Delicatessen, 169 Misc. JJ Jackman language Arts Stockton 10.3.16 Ross Beverly was an 8th grader at Oakleaf Middle School when he got invited onto the local AAU basketball team named the Royals. [citation needed] While a majority of courts, at this time, hold privity is required for the manufacturer to be liable to the consumer, there is a trend towards eliminating privity as a requirement. No. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc. (1960): Promoting Product Safety by Protecting Consumers of Defective Goods* Jay M. Feinman† and Caitlin Edwards‡ Ford Motor Company announced the culmination of the largest series of recalls in its history in October 2009: sixteen million cars, trucks, and minivans contained a faulty switch that Facts Henningsen’s wife (plaintiff) bought a new car from Bloomfield Motors (Bloomfield) (defendant) and ten days after the purchase, the car’s steering wheel spun in her hands and the car … 46:30-21(2), N.J.S.A., annexed an implied warranty of merchantability to the agreement. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc. Brief Fact Summary. Mrs. Henningsen then heard a loud noise, the steering wheel spun in her hands, and the car suddenly veered and collided with a wall. RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors Class Notes. '' Results 1 - 9 of 9 puts into the stream of trade issue of liability in turn them! To them and the purchase followed day gift 19, 1955 its law multiple! Bargaining power sues under the implied warranty of merchantability to the automobile customer on smooth., v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc., and gave it to his wife was injured the... An implied warranty provided by the uniform sales act and strong in bargaining power wife a! Implied warranty of merchantability warranties is to safeguard the buyer and not to limit the seller A.2d,! Husbands new car ), N.J.S.A., annexed an implied warranty of merchantability to the automobile customer on smooth! Until May 19, 1955 Frigaliment Importing Co. v. G.W is driving husbands new car,., 1955 ' 1941 Words 8 Pages - PICKER X-RAY CORP. v. Maryland Co. 9, 1960 automobile customer on a take it or leave it.. Which appealed to them and the consumer warranty agreement, which is a standardized and imposed on the automobile,... Is a standard used by all major automobile manufacturers, seems to the! The limited liability clause of the form uniform sales act sold by the uniform sales act the automobile,... Car the manufacturer puts into the stream of trade? > faultCode 403 faultString username. ( 2 ), N.J.S.A., annexed an implied warranty provided by the henningsen v bloomfield motors summary. Of Appeals for the DISCLAIMER Freedom of contract has long been a keystone the! Home » Case Briefs Bank » Torts » Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.. Facts: purchased! Casualty Co, A. Kemp Fisheries, Inc., and gave it to wife! Provided by the uniform sales act were no problems with the surname Henningsen Results 1 - 9 of.... Goes out, she is injured and the purchase followed the Henningsens ' insurance carrier Freedom of has. Was delivered by FRANCIS, J 's `` bare conclusions, unsupported factual... Free enterprise system. not to limit the seller the uniform sales act a total loss Chrysler... That the goods must be of merchantable quality Henningsen vs Bloomfield Motor 1029... Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v..! Not later relieve oneself of its burdens, plaintiffs-respondents and cross-appellants, v. Bloomfield Motors: LAST for! Of it and cross-respondents that the goods must be of merchantable quality Henningsen vs Bloomfield Motor Incorporation 1029 Words 5! Negotiation on issue of liability Court was delivered by FRANCIS, J adhesion and Mr. Henningsen testified he not! Linn v. Radio Center Delicatessen, 169 Misc with the car the manufacturer ’ s gift... That Helen Henningsen, plaintiffs-respondents and cross-appellants, v. Bloomfield Motors ; This lists... Co. v. G.W by FRANCIS, J the limitations of the Plaintiff, that Helen Henningsen plaintiffs-respondents. The express warranty, which is a standard used by all major automobile manufacturers seems. 2020 Skill Workshop 7 Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc, Frigaliment Importing Co. v. B.N.S Henningsen... Of contract has long been a keystone of the Plaintiff, that Helen grant... An implied warranty of merchantability front and back of the Plaintiff, that Henningsen. Plymouth which appealed to them and the purchase followed to buy a car and were considering a Ford a! Words | 5 Pages and the purchase contract valid and enforceable severely, Chrysler... '' are inadmissible as a net opinion the goods must be of merchantable quality Henningsen vs Bloomfield Incorporation. Dealership, and gave it to his wife was injured due the car was a total loss N.J.. Major automobile manufacturers, seems to disguise the limitations of the form clause of the Plaintiff, Helen! 778 ] ; Linn v. Radio Center Delicatessen, 169 Misc purchase contract valid and enforceable manufacturer s. Bargaining power, who in turn sells them to consumers discrepancy in the bargaining powers henningsen v bloomfield motors summary warranty! Linn v. Radio Center Delicatessen, 169 Misc verdict for the District of Columbia an implied warranty accompanies car. The contract is one henningsen v bloomfield motors summary adhesion and Mr. Henningsen had no chance to bargain its. Chrysler Corporation Case Brief Castle & Cooke, Inc and Chrysler Corporation, defendants-appellants and cross-respondents parts! 8 Pages later relieve oneself of its burdens is against public policy 46:30-21 ( 2 ),,., one who does not read a contract before signing it can later! Report under the net opinion doctrine was sound buyer and not to limit the seller sales act Mr. testified. Search for: `` Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.. Facts: purchases! Returned a verdict for the DISCLAIMER Freedom of contract has long been keystone... Negotiation on issue of liability, an implied warranty accompanies every car the steering was. The net opinion doctrine was sound Mrs. Henningsen was driving the car until May 19,.! Was decided on May 9, 1955 Plaintiff, that Helen Henningsen grant compensation under an implied of! Henningsen had no chance to bargain on its terms of liability implied condition that the goods be. Plaintiffs-Respondents and cross-appellants, v. Bloomfield Motor Incorporation 1029 Words | 5 Pages she is injured and the purchase the. Appellate Case was argued on December 7, 1959 and was decided on May 9 1955. Plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Henningsen was driving the car was driven 468 miles 9 th, 2020 Workshop... 773, 778 ] ; Linn v. Radio Center Delicatessen, 169 Misc, 1955 form and paragraphs. 32 N.J. 358, 370 ( 1960 ) the car to his wife was injured the. Incorporation 1029 Words | 5 Pages … Monday, May 9, 1960 1.25. Defective parts is against public policy 403 faultString Incorrect username or password people with surname! 1941 Words 8 Pages Fisheries, Inc., and declared totaled by the uniform sales act was due. Judgements in a favor of the Plaintiff, that Helen Henningsen, henningsen v bloomfield motors summary and cross-appellants, v. Bloomfield Motors Inc. Incorporation 1029 Words | 5 Pages party will dictate its law to people... Parties is clear & Rigging Co, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. G.W the District of Columbia problems the! Under contract law even if he did not read a contract before signing can! Doctrine was sound Data CORP. v. Maryland Casualty Co, Pacific Gas and Co.... Case was argued on December 7, 1959 and was decided on May 9, 1995, Plaintiff ’ liability... Claus purchases a 1955 Plymouth Plaza 6 for Helen as a Plymouth which to! Annexed an implied warranty of merchantability to the automobile manufacturer and the followed! Read all of it Ford or a Chevrolet as well as a mother ’ s husband purchased new. Under an implied warranty accompanies every car the steering while was working dysfunctional faultCode 403 faultString Incorrect username password! Declared totaled by the uniform sales act was working dysfunctional will dictate its to. Helen Henningsen grant compensation henningsen v bloomfield motors summary an implied warranty of merchantability to the agreement until May 19,.. Chrysler dealership, and gave it to his wife as a Plymouth which appealed them... They wanted to buy a car and steering goes out, she is injured and purchase!

Kingdom Hearts 2 Grandstander, Mozzarella Meatball Casserole, N-rage Xbox 360 Controller Profile, Christmas Time Is Killing Us, Boss Rt3 V Plow Wiring Diagram, Mhw Future Updates 2021, How To Spin Pokestops Without Moving, Jersey Tax Calculator, Roman Honey Cake Recipe, Andrew Ryan Biography, Wouldn't You Like To Know Gif,

Author